Tun 1992 takalman da Christian Louboutin ya tsara suna da alamun ja, launi da aka tsara a cikin lambar shaida ta duniya kamar Pantone 18 1663TP.
Ya fara ne lokacin da mai zanen Faransa ya karɓi samfurin takalmin da yake zayyana (wahayi ta"Flowers"by Andy Warhol) amma bai gamsu ba saboda ko da yake samfurin ne mai launi sosai yana da duhu sosai a bayan tafin.
Don haka yana da ra'ayin yin gwaji ta hanyar zana tafin zane da jan ƙusa na mataimakinsa. Ya ji daɗin sakamakon har ya kafa shi a cikin dukan tarinsa kuma ya mai da shi hatimin sirri da aka sani a duniya.
Amma keɓancewar fifikon jan tafin tafin hannun daular CL an yanke shi lokacin da wasu samfuran kayan kwalliya da yawa suka ƙara jan tafin zuwa ƙirar takalminsu.
Kirista Louboutin ba ya shakka cewa launi na alama alama ce ta musamman don haka ya cancanci kariya. Don haka ne ma ya garzaya kotu don ya sami takardar shaidar launi don kare keɓancewa da martabar tarinsa, tare da guje wa rikice-rikice tsakanin masu amfani da asali da ingancin samfurin.
A cikin Amurka, Loubitin ya sami kariya daga tafin takalminsa a matsayin kariyar alamar alamar sa bayan ya ci nasara akan Yves Saint Laurent.
A Turai ma kotuna sun yanke hukuncin amincewa da fitattun tafin kafa bayan da kamfanin takalmi na Holland Van Haren ya fara tallata kayayyakin da jan tafin.
Hukuncin na baya-bayan nan ya zo ne bayan Kotun Turai ta kuma yanke hukuncin amincewa da kamfanin na Faransa yana jayayya cewa launin ja a kasan takalmin ya zama sanannen halayyar alama akan fahimtar cewa launin ja Pantone 18 1663TP yana da cikakkiyar rajista kamar yadda ya dace. alama, idan dai yana da bambanci, kuma cewa gyarawa a kan tafin kafa ba za a iya fahimtar siffar alamar kanta ba, amma kawai a matsayin wurin da alamar gani.
A kasar Sin, yakin ya faru ne lokacin da ofishin alamar kasuwanci na kasar Sin ya ki amincewa da aikace-aikacen fadada alamar kasuwanci da aka shigar a WIPO don yin rajistar alamar kasuwanci "launi ja" (Pantone No. 18.1663TP) don kaya, "takalmin mata" - aji 25, saboda "alamar ba ta bambanta ba dangane da kayan da aka ambata".
Bayan daukaka kara kuma daga karshe ya rasa hukuncin da kotun kolin birnin Beijing ta yanke na goyon bayan CL bisa hujjar cewa an gano kuskuren yanayin wannan alamar da abubuwan da ke cikinta.
Kotun kolin birnin Beijing ta bayyana cewa, dokar rajistar alamar kasuwanci ta Jamhuriyar Jama'ar kasar Sin ba ta haramta yin rajista a matsayin alamar matsayi na launi daya a kan wani samfurin ko labarin ba.
Dangane da sashi na 8 na wannan doka, yana karantawa kamar haka: duk wata alama ta musamman mallakar ɗan adam, mai shari'a ko wata ƙungiya ta mutane, gami da, kalmomi, zane, haruffa, lambobi, mai girma uku. alama, haɗin launuka da sauti, da haɗin waɗannan abubuwan, ana iya yin rijista azaman alamar kasuwanci mai rijista.
Saboda haka, kuma ko da yake manufar alamar kasuwanci mai rijista da Louboutin ya gabatar ba a fayyace shi a cikin Mataki na ashirin da 8 na Doka a matsayin alamar kasuwanci mai rijista ba, kuma da alama ba a cire shi daga yanayin da aka jera a cikin tanadin doka ba.
Hukuncin Kotun Koli na Janairu 2019, ya ƙare kusan shekaru tara na ƙararraki, ya kare rajistar takamaiman alamomin launi, haɗin launi ko ƙirar da aka sanya akan wasu samfuran / labarai (alamar matsayi).
Alamar matsayi gabaɗaya ana ɗaukarta alama ce da ta ƙunshi alamar launi mai girma uku ko 2D ko haɗin duk waɗannan abubuwan, kuma ana sanya wannan alamar a wani matsayi na musamman akan kayan da ake tambaya.
Ba da izinin kotunan kasar Sin su fassara tanade-tanaden doka ta 8 na dokar rajistar alamar kasuwanci ta kasar Sin, la'akari da cewa za a iya amfani da wasu abubuwa a matsayin alamar kasuwanci mai rijista.
Lokacin aikawa: Maris 23-2022
