Kirista Louboutin da "yakin da ja-sarkar strattos"

Tun 1992 takalmin da Christian Louboutin suna sane da jan SOLES, Digina launi a cikin lambar alama ta kasa ta duniya kamar pantone 18 1663TP.

An fara ne lokacin da mai zanen Faransawa ya karbi jawabin takalmin da yake ƙira (wahayi ta"Furanni"Ta hanyar Andy Warth) Amma bai tabbata ba saboda kodayake samfurin mai launi ne sosai duhu sosai a bayan tafin.

Don haka yana da manufar yin gwaji ta hanyar zana tafin ƙirar tare da maƙarƙashiyar ƙusa ja. Ya fi son sakamakon sosai wanda ya kafa shi a cikin dukkan tarin abubuwa kuma ya juya shi cikin abin da aka tantance shi a duk duniya.

Amma bamban da keɓantar da samar da alamar alamar kwalliyar CL ta tsayar da kayan kwalliyar kwalliya lokacin da nau'ikan nau'ikan salon da dama suka kara jan tafinsu na takalmin su.

Christian Louboutin baya shakka cewa launin fata alama ce ta musamman alama sabili da haka ya cancanci kariya. A saboda wannan dalili, ya tafi kotu don samun murjani mai amfani da kuma girma daga cikin tarin da ke tsakanin masu siyarwa da ingancin samfurin.

A cikin Amurka, Loubebetin ya sami kariya daga cikin kayan takalman sa a matsayin mai ba da alama ce ta alama ta asali bayan da ya ci nasara a kan musanta warware takobin yves.

A Turai ma kotuna sun yi mulki a cikin goyon bayan almara na Dutchan bayan da kamfanin Dutchan Van Harra ya fara samfuran tallata tare da alamar.

Hukuncin kwanan nan ya zo bayan farfajiyar Kotun Turai ya yi hukunci a kan shafin Faransa a matsayin alamar launin fata, amma kawai a matsayin alamar gani.

A cikin China, yaƙin ya faru lokacin da Ofishin Alamar Alamar Sin ya ƙi yin rajista na kasuwanci "(Pantone 25, saboda" Mark ɗin Mata ba shi da mahimmanci dangane da kayan da aka ambata ".

Bayan da a ƙarshe ya rasa hukuncin Kotun Koli na Beijing don nuna COM a kan filaye cewa yanayin wannan alamar da aka gano.

Kotun Koli ta Beijing ta gudanar da rajistar kasuwanci ta Jamhuriyar Jama'ar Sin ba ta haramtawa da rajista a matsayin alamar launi guda a kan wani samfurin / labarin.

Dangane da labarin na 8 na wannan doka, yana karanta kamar haka: Duk wani alama mai rarrabe ta asali, a cikin lambobi, a cikin lambobi, a cikin alamu guda ɗaya, ana iya yin rajista a matsayin alamar kasuwanci mai rijista.

A sakamakon haka, kuma ko da yake manufar Alamar Alamar Alamar da aka gabatar da Louboutin bai bayyana ba a cikin wannan al'amari alamar mai rijista, kuma ba ze cire shi daga yanayin da aka jera a cikin dokokin dokokin.

Kotun koli ta yanke hukunci game da Janairu 2019, ta ƙare kusan shekaru tara na karawa, hadar da takamaiman rajistar launi, haduwa da launi ko alamu da aka sanya a kan wasu samfura / labaran launi).

Mark ɗin matsayin an dauke shi alama ce ta ƙunshi alama mai launi uku ko 2D ko haɗin waɗannan abubuwan, kuma an sanya wannan alamar a cikin wani matsayi a cikin kayan tambaya.

Bada izinin kotunan kasar Sin don fassara abubuwan da labarin 19 na dokar kasuwanci ta kasar Sin, la'akari da cewa ana iya amfani da sauran abubuwan kasuwanci mai rijista.